Ace the CBAP Exam 2025 – Unleash Your Business Analysis Superpowers!

Question: 1 / 815

Which business analysis approach is generally considered more risk averse?

Plan-driven business analysis

Plan-driven business analysis is characterized by its emphasis on extensive planning and documentation before initiating project execution. This approach is generally considered more risk-averse because it focuses on thorough upfront analysis, detailed project scope, and requirements gathering, which helps identify potential risks early on. By having a comprehensive understanding of the project and its objectives at the outset, stakeholders are better equipped to mitigate risks and manage uncertainties throughout the project lifecycle.

Moreover, in plan-driven approaches, adherence to structured methodologies and change control processes reduces the likelihood of unexpected changes that could disrupt the project. This structured nature fosters an environment where potential pitfalls can be identified and addressed proactively, making it a suitable choice for projects where stability and predictability are paramount.

In contrast, other approaches, such as change-driven business analysis, prioritize flexibility and adaptability, which can introduce more associated risks. The IPECC-driven and 9KA-driven methodologies may focus on integrating specific processes or frameworks, but they do not inherently emphasize the same level of risk aversion present in plan-driven analysis.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Change-driven business analysis

IPECC-driven business analysis

9KA-driven business analysis

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy